« Warning copy editors! | Main | But it looks so shiny! »

Reviewers reviewed

You’ll be shocked, shocked to learn that some computer hardware review sites are disintegrious. But what I really liked about that Slashdot thread was readers’ recommendations of sites that seem not to be selling good reviews to the highest bidder:


Tom’s Hardware and CNET were most often mentioned as sites to actively distrust.

Unfortunately, none of these are living up to Consumer Reports’ standard of buying all test products from retailers, anonymously, and refusing all advertising. (Consumer Reports’ computer reviews are of the Dell vs. Gateway variety, not for geeks building their own machines.)

Of those sites, I’ve looked at Storage Review extensively, and it looks good. I also spent a lot of time recently reading Silent PC Review, and trust them.

Of course, “a couple of Slashdot posters said so” isn’t the world’s most rigorous standard of authority. Better not trust me, either.

Comments

"disintegrious"?

Unfortunately, I no longer have online access to the OED. I'll check my Compact OED at home later, but according to this site:

Before Nihil Obstat comments that "integrious" isn't a real word, let me state that it is. It is quite rare, but you can find it in old copies of the Oxford English Dictionary, which gives it the meaning of "marked by integrity". Several friends of mine think the word is in need of a comeback and speculate that the lack of an adjective form of integrity in modern parlance is symptomatic of a culture that places a diminishing value on true integrity.

Disintegrious is my neologism (you can choose whether that's according to definition 1, or 3b.) I think it flows nicely with "shocked, shocked."

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)