Kind Hearts Are More Than Coronets
I was telling my friend, Debbie, that I had recently discovered three conspicuous holes in Pocahontas’ movie comedy literacy: Arsenic and Old Lace, The Court Jester, and… I blanked on the third one.
“Kind Hearts and Coronets”, she said, without missing a beat. Of course the third element of the series that begins Arsenic and Old Lace and The Court Jester is Kind Hearts and Coronets.
Pocahontas and I have since corrected those holes, and she loved all of them, to no great surprise. I especially enjoyed seeing Kind Hearts again. The premise is that our hero is the son of a disowned daughter of a duke, placing him personally at about 11th in the line of succession. When the family refuses to let his mother be buried in the family crypt, he vows to murder them all (neatly gaining himself a duchy.) Much of the movie is given over to his carrying out these murders, one by one. (That’s no more spoiler than the trailer offers — the fun is in the journey.)
The methods of Louis’ murders are in the spirit of George Orwell’s famous essay “Decline of the English Murder” (1946), in which he regretted the modern practice of simply shooting people and being done with it. Praising the ingenuity of an earlier generation of English murders, Orwell examines those crimes “which have given the greatest pleasure to the British public,” finding that poison is the preferable means, and that an ideal murderer is a member of the middle class who hopes to improve his social position or get hold of a legacy.
There was some talk of remaking Kind Hearts; I’m relieved to find no mention of it subsequent to 2000 — it looks like the plans fell through. (Remember, what’s killing Hollywood is too much originality. Did Connie Willis have to be so right?)
The rules of succession to the British throne are somewhat complicated:
The basis for the succession was determined in the constitutional developments of the seventeenth century, which culminated in the Bill of Rights (1689) and the Act of Settlement (1701). […]
The succession to the throne is regulated not only through descent, but also by statute; the Act of Settlement confirmed that it was for Parliament to determine the title to the throne.
The Act laid down that only Protestant descendants of Princess Sophia - the Electress of Hanover and granddaughter of James I - are eligible to succeed. Subsequent Acts have confirmed this.
Parliament, under the Bill of Rights and the Act of Settlement, also laid down various conditions which the Sovereign must meet. A Roman Catholic is specifically excluded from succession to the throne; nor may the Sovereign marry a Roman Catholic.
The Sovereign must, in addition, be in communion with the Church of England and must swear to preserve the established Church of England and the established Church of Scotland. The Sovereign must also promise to uphold the Protestant succession.
Wikipedia, incredibly, lists the first 865 people in line for the British throne. On the occasion of the Queen’s Golden Jubilee, the Guardian sought to interview the Queen. When she refused, they thought they’d get someone in line for the throne, and invited everyone over 18 years old in the top 38. When they all refused, they kept going. Eventually, they found Raggi Lorentzen.
All of which explains why I am making this absurd day trip to San Francisco to talk to a woman who, like our Queen, is the great-great-granddaughter of Queen Victoria, but whose resemblance to her distant cousin ends there. Raggi Lorentzen is 34, tanned, blonde, very Nordic in appearance and co-owns two tapas restaurants in downtown San Francisco (one, the Thirsty Bear, doubles as a brewery). She was born and brought up in Rio, where her mother, Princess Ragnhild, moved soon after marrying her bodyguard-turned-businessman husband. They originally went there for two years; they have lived there for almost 50.
Raggi has dual Norwegian-Brazilian citizenship; is fluent in Norwegian and Portuguese; speaks somewhat haltingly in English and has no designs on the British throne. She did not know she was 66th in line, although she realised that as a descendant of Victoria she was somewhere on the list; nor did she realise that if she marries her Irish Catholic boyfriend she forfeits her place. The relationship is not in immediate danger.
I always wondered if she’d seen Kind Hearts, but she has since given it all up for love.
Re: #66---That is freakin' awesome. I suppose I technically went to college with Prince Haakon, though I never met him. I wonder if he hung out with his cousin when he was here. I will have to go check out that brewery. What a great name! Tapas is always a good idea. Thanks for the tip.
I love the geneological tables you get if you look up the descendants of Henry Percy Hotspur--sometimes it seems like every American WASP traces a claim to the throne through Hotspur.
Posted by Saheli on February 8 2006 00:12
Have you seen all the other Ealing Street comedies?
Presently in my Netflix queue, those I've yet not yet seen are The Maggie, High Wind in Jamaica, Whisky Galore, I'm All Right Jack (okay, not Ealing, but Sellers -- I also have a bunch of Fifties Peter Sellers films in the queue that I've not seen -- The Wrong Arm Of The Law, Two-Way Stretch), and The Titfield Thunderbolt. I trust Pocahantas has seen The Man In The White Suit?
Meanwhile, any excuse to quote:
No, I can't do all that from memory.Posted by Gary Farber on February 10 2006 21:14
I've seen "The Ladykillers" and "The Man in the White Suit", but not the others; I don't think Pocahontas has seen any but "Kind Hearts." I should add more Ealing Street to our rent-some-time list.
Posted by Zed
on
February 11 2006 08:27
"I've seen "The Ladykillers" and "The Man in the White Suit","
Yeah, those are the one's everyone's -- well, everyone who is a mild film fan, anyway -- has seen (with KH&C). They used to be in rep houses all the time, and on PBS and tv reruns, etc., in America (and on cable, later, on the right channels). Seen 'em a zillion times, though not in a while, so they're in my Queue, too. The others: not. Which is why they were some of the first entries on my Netflix queue when the Netflix sub was donated a couple of months ago. Of course, that was along with the other 450+ films/documentaries I put into my Queue in the first few hours. :-) (The two you mention and KH&C: seen 'em a zillion times, though not in a few years, so they're in my Queue, too, but much further down.)
It's down to ~430 now! I've seen a couple of dozen, and added a few more! Problem is I keep obsessively reading the internets instead, swearing that each evening I'll finally watch a movie tonight. And then it's 2:30 a.m. Right now, in the computer DVD drive (the damn stand-alone DVD player having died two or so weeks ago, at the not-ripe age of 55 weeks, damnit): Wes Anderson's Life Aquatic. Must. Close. Firefox. Now.
Finally got through the neo-Battlestar Galactica 2.0 disks a couple of nights ago, although only by staying up until 4:45 a.m., and being a zombie the next day; took about a week and a half even to get through those; been a few weeks since an actual movie, damnit. I love movies; obsessively reading even more, though, apparently.
The unseen Ealing films are in the Top 25 now, though. Read about them for years (there are a few good web pages).
Posted by Gary Farber on February 11 2006 20:19