It was just the anti-Semitism talking
A couple of commenters thought I was being unfair to conclude that Mel Gibson is an anti-Semitic nutcase and to shun his movies. Well, like Slate said:
Is Mel Gibson an anti-Semite? Until his recent drunk-driving arrest, the only way to investigate that hypothesis was to study Gibson’s controversial 2004 film, The Passion of the Christ, or to puzzle out why Gibson, in an interview with Peggy Noonan for Reader’s Digest, declined to put any distance between himself and his father’s crackpot view that the Holocaust never occurred. “[I]f someone denies the Holocaust one day and makes a film accusing Jews of Christ-killing the next day,” my Slate colleague Christopher Hitchens reasoned, “I have to say that if he’s not anti-Jewish then he’s certainly getting there.” There remained at least a theoretical possibility that this was all just a terrible misunderstanding.
That possibility no longer exists. The best case that can be made for Gibson’s belief system now is that he’s anti-Semitic only when he’s three sheets to the wind. And really, now. Are you in the habit of declaring, “The Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world” when you get pie-eyed? Or simply of muttering, “Fucking Jews”? Or of asking your arresting officer, “Are you a Jew?”
There is a silver lining to this story. I think Gibson probably would have entered politics. I think this incident pretty much puts an end to that. But, then, the ablity of some on the right to act as apologist for unsavory characters has continually surprised me.
I will admit a morbid curiousity about what his take on the Holocaust would have been.